MIGRATION THE ONLY WAY OUT

COP16 MEXICO MIGRATION THE ONLY WAY OUT

Climate change migration crisis is no longer an understatement, COP16 Mexico migration should receive highest attention, dialogue between developed and developing countries.
Scientist have affirmed the warming of the climate system and linked it to human activities. This is justified by the increase in the average surface temperature by about 0.6 C.
Development is about expanding human potential and enlarging human freedom. It is about people developing the capabilities that empower them to make choices that they value most.
Climate change threatens to erode human freedoms and limit choice. It calls into question the enlightment principle that human progress will make the future look better than the past.
The early warning signs are already visible for everybody to see. In Ghana and other developing countries, millions of the world's poorest people are already being forced to cope with the impacts of climate change. These impacts do not register as apocalyptic events in the full glare of world media attention. They go unnoticed in financial markets and in the measurement of the world Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
However, increased exposure to drought, to more intense storms, to floods and environmental stress is holding back efforts of the world's poor to build a better life for themselves and their children.
The starting point for avoiding dangerous climate change is recognition of three distinctive features of the problem. There are no rewind buttons for running down stocks. People living at the start of the 22nd Century will live with consequences of our emissions just as we are living with the consequences of emissions since the industrial revolution.
For instance for the first half of this 21st Century the world in general, especially the poor will have to live with climate change to which are already committed.
In the last three decades, about 22 countries in Africa have been affected by flood and 1.5 million people have been displaced, whilst at least 300 people have been killed.
The fact that climate change also is worsening the migration crisis is no longer an understatement. The droughts, the terrible floods caused by severe storms, water contamination, soil erosion and degradation, as well as other destructive impacts of the neoliberal environmental disaster are bringing about the displacement of thousands of people, mainly women and ruined farmers, from their rural communities and forcing them towards the cities and the North in a desperate search for the means of survival for them and their families.
It is estimated that 50 million people have been forced to migrate due to the effects of climate change. These “climate displaced persons” have come to swell the ranks of the more than 300 million people, according to the International Organization for Migration (IOM), that today represent the worse crisis of migration that humanity has faced.

Unfold. As sea levels rise and tropical storms gather in intensity, millions of people face displacement. Dryland inhabitants, some of the most vulnerable on our planet, have to cope with more frequent and more sustained droughts. And as glaciers retreat, water supplies are being put at risk".
Ghana is part of this pending global disaster. Unfortunately it has not been given the needed attention in country to mitigate its impact in the future. Very rare do we hear of any discussion on climate change by the leadership of this country.
The consistent human activities in the industrial areas, emission of greenhouse gases, bush fires, felling of trees and the discovery of oil which will lead to the sitting of oil companies puts Ghana in a more dangerous position in the coming years.
The recent flood that hit the Northern, Upper East, Upper West and Western Regions in September 2010 revealed the nations vulnerability. The following were the statistics that were recorded by the Ministry of Interior with regards to the flood;
Number of deaths - 16
Number Displaced - 31,360
Houses Destroyed– 34,919
Roads Damaged - 45
Farmlands Destroyed - 6,85
Dams & Bridges Destroyed – 13
e extent of damage in the area disclosed that about 3000 people mostly women and children had been displaced by the floods, with more than 200 buildings at both sides of the Buipe toll booth badly affected. http://news.myjoyonline.com/news/201010/54989.asp
The economic, health and social cost of this flood was so enormous that donor agencies, philanthropist and companies had to come in to support the victims.There exist a gap between scientific evidence of what is happening and political actions.
Climate change is a challenge that needs to be addressed now to reduce the risk it poses to the youth of today and generations unborn. The future generation of this country stands directly in harm's way and they have the least resources to cope.
The coalition urges the various political parties to show commitment to the issue through their campaign messages. They must know that no meaningful development can be done if the climate is not favourable.
Please call 0244023651 E-mail: amoatengken@gmail.com for further enquiries
Kenneth Nana Amoateng



--
"when the voice of the people become so loud the government has no alternative but to listen" Martin Luther King Jnr.

John F. Kennedy once observed that “our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man.”

Kenneth Nana Amoateng
AYICC West African Coordinator
Abibimman Foundation
Ghana National Youth Coalition on Climate Change (GNYCCC)
GCAP/MDGs-Ghana
FoodSPAN
IDAY-GHANA
P.O.BOX BT 1 Tema
Flat 1/A 74 Site 3
(OPP T.DC),Commmunit 1
Tema-Ghana/African
E-Mail: amoatengken@yahoo.com
http://www.abibimman.org
http://www.1010global.org/gh
Tel# 233-0303-213918
Mob:233244023651
skype:kenneth.nana.amoateng
I'm on assignment to my generation.

Human Rights

Why is biofuel production an issue in Ghana/African?

Biofuel is an issue because developed countries are embarking on major policy shifts towards the use of biofuel as an alternative source of energy (for heating and transportation). It is thought of as a means to combating climate change resulting from the heavy dependence on fossil fuels.

This policy change has serious implications for developing countries as there is rush for investments and land with serious consequences for livelihoods, food security, the environment and human rights. As a result, small-scale farmers, the poor and vulnerable are battling with food insecurity or hunger, and are often the most hit by the effects of developed countries’ quest for alternative source of energy. In taking sides with these groups, it is not only appropriate and timely, but also our responsibility to make our opinions and demands known on the issue of biofuel production, to ensure people do not unduly suffer from this phenomenon.

This policy brief, covering the implications of biofuel production on food security, livelihoods and rural development, the environment, climate change, energy security and human rights, seeks to present the situation, effects and the position of civil society organizations. It also offers some indications on what policy measures to take, to ensure that the rights of small-scale farmers, the poor and vulnerable groups are respected, protected and fulfilled.

2.0 Bio-fuel production and Food security

2.1 Millions Go Hungry

The world has about a billion people in the developing countries that are chronically hungry. It is estimated that an additional 140 million people, of whom Africa and South Asia will account for over two-thirds, will be at risk of hunger, if biofuels production targets set by powerful economies are to be met in 2030. Biofuel projects are displacing farmers from their productive farm lands for Jatropha and other agrofuel plantation. Consequently this will affect food availability and accessibility among poor small-scale farm families and households. The competition for land for biofuels production by the rich and powerful companies, will lead to low food productivity and food insecurity, among small-scale farmers and the poor.

2.2 Competition between food and fuel

Crops that have become ready candidates worldwide for the development of biofuels include agricultural crops such as corn, soya beans, sugar cane, sorghum, cassava, rapeseed, palm oil, coconut oil, sunflower and Jatropha. Significant proportions of these crops, which otherwise would have been used for food are diverted into ethanol and biodiesel production. Biofuels production has significant implications for countries pursuing extensive production and use of biofuels. Analysis by UN agricultural scientists has indicated that the diversion of crops to fuel can raise food prices and reduce our ability to alleviate hunger.

3.0 Livelihoods and Rural Development

More than 70 percent of the world poor are found in rural areas of developing countries and most of them depend on agriculture for their livelihoods. This sector needs to be given the highest development priority, nationally and internationally. Meanwhile it has been estimated that with the current biofuel targets, crop and agriculture value addition will be increased by just 6 percent in the developed and 3 percent in the developing countries in 2030

Although biofuels production may help in improving livelihoods and rural development, especially when it is undertaken by the local people and meant to address local / community energy needs, destruction of the environment on which rural people depend for their livelihoods, can hamper rural development. Large-scale foreign dominated plantation for biofuel production involving the destruction of local environment will affect the livelihoods and development of the rural communities. Any biofuel production model, which is not supportive of community energy development model that caters for the developmental needs of community members, is an affront to rural dwellers’ right to livelihoods and development.

4.0 Environment: Deforestation and Biodiversity

Most small-scale farmers, the poor and vulnerable in our country, especially in the rural areas depend on the environment for their livelihoods. Naturally, environmental degradation impacts on availability of food. Large-scale plantation cultivation of biofuel crops also entails the increased use of agro-chemicals. These will have serious negative impacts on plant and animal life as well as the quality of water bodies close to the facility. Although biofuel is espoused as ensuring clean environment (as opposed to fossil fuels), the destruction of biodiversity through massive deforestation for large-scale plantations for biofuel is counter-productive.

Since environmental destruction for biofuel production will perpetuate poverty and hunger among affected communities, policy makers are expected to ensure strict enforcement of environmental impact assessment that encompasses the interest of affected communities. More importantly, incentive schemes aimed at avoiding deforestation need to be negotiated in the context of post-Kyoto agreements on combating climate change, when establishing biofuel projects.

5.0 Climate and Energy Security

It is often indicated that biofuel production can have positive impacts such as being considered to be a sustainable and cheap fuel alternative. It reduces carbon dioxide emissions and world dependence on finite oil supplies, and its use, therefore, would solve the energy and climate crisis. Despite these positive aspects of biofuel production, it is feared that the positive impacts and opportunities biofuel production may present, are an unwarranted optimism, since the threats land acquisitions present to people’s livelihoods and ecological sustainability are real. For instance, the estimated global greenhouse gas emissions in 2006 amounted to 45 Gt in carbon dioxide equivalent, of which some 62 percent is energy related. Meanwhile the current biofuels development will not result in greenhouse gas savings until after 2030. Indeed, it must be noted that liquid biofuels are only one among many sources of renewable energy and their efficiency and societal value needs to be assessed vis-à-vis other current and future energy options in the context of comprehensive national and global energy strategies.

6. Human Rights

The enjoyment of fundamental human rights and freedoms could be undermined by biofuel production. The UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, while calling for a 5-year moratorium on biofuel, has described policies of the US and EU for producing biofuels as “crime against humanity”, since by their policies they are contributing to an explosive global food crisis through using food crops to produce fuel.

Large-scale biofuel companies are forcefully ejecting small-scale farmers, denying them of their rights to settlement, livelihoods, social and cultural development and especially their right to food. No doubt that corporatization of land for biofuel production is a threat to Human Rights. Duty bearers should bear in mind that, biofuel must not undermine the Right to Food. Since all human rights are universal, interdependent and indivisible, companies embarking on biofuel production must not violate the rights of small-scale farmers, the poor and vulnerable in the communities that they operate

♫ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-Rx2ALxQQE

--
"when the voice of the people become so loud the government has no alternative but to listen" Martin Luther King Jnr.

John F. Kennedy once observed that “our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man.”

Kenneth Nana Amoateng
AYICC West African Coordinator
Abibimman Foundation
Ghana National Youth Coalition on Climate Change (GNYCCC)
Energy crossroads-Ghana
GCAP/MDGs-Ghana
Torch-Ghana
IDAY-GHANA
P.O.BOX BT 1 Tema
Flat 1/A 74 Site 3
(OPP T.DC),Commmunit 1
Tema-Ghana/African
E-Mail: amoatengken@yahoo.com
Tel# 233-22-213918
Mob# 2332-244023651
skype:kenneth.nana.amoateng
I'm on assignment to my generation.

World Bank Talk Hypocritica

The World Bank at its best.
Earlier this week – the World Bank is investing heavily in coal, despite recently warning that climate change will cripple development efforts. Talk about hypocritical!
The bank has spent $5 billion over the past three years on fossil fuel projects.
The World Bank’s chief economist for sustainable development, Marianne Fay, defends this investment given that coal remains on of the cheapest and most stable energy sources available for the 1.6 billion people who currently lack electricity.
Straight from the horses mouth:
“There are a lot of poor countries which have coal reserves and for them it’s the only option. The [bank’s] policy is to continue funding coal to the extent that there is no alternative and to push for the most efficient coal plants possible. Frankly, it would be immoral at this stage to say, ‘We want to have clean hands, therefore we are not going to touch coal’.”
Sorry Marianne, “sustainable development” and coal simply don’t mix. I agree that we need to lift people out of poverty, but coal is not the way to do it.


--
"when the voice of the people become so loud the government has no alternative but to listen" Martin Luther King Jnr.

John F. Kennedy once observed that “our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man.”

Today is a great day for ambition in these climate talks

Today is a great day for ambition in these climate talks. One of the most northern countries of the World, Norway, has announced that they will reduce their emissions by 40% by 2020 on 1990 levels. At this date, it’s the biggest commitment announced by an Annex 1 country. And the first that comes anywhere close to what the science demands Compared to the targets (or lack of) from countries such as USA or Canada, this target is very significant.

This is why we have to encourage this country and to spread the word about this! Norway has show that we can be ambitious in these negotiations. They have decided to break ice today, to avoid their glaciers melting and to avoid seeing more and more devestating climate consequences around the world.

Thanks to us, the tracker team, you can live and look at this exceptional time as if you were there with. Send this link round, speak about that with the politicians you know and encourage your country to follow Norway’s lead and be more ambitious.

The fight against climate change needs courage and ambition.
John F. Kennedy once observed that “our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man.”

What is Redd?

What is Redd?
It's a way of paying poor countries to protect their forests. Global deforestation accounts for nearly 20% of all CO2 emissions and all previous attempts to curb it have failed. Redd — "Reducing emission from deforestation and forest degradation " would allow countries that can reduce emissions from deforestation to be paid for doing so.
Where did the idea come from?
Papua New Guinea along with nine other countries proposed it in 2005 at a UN climate meeting. It has gained ground and is now likely to be one of the cornerstones of any agreement at the Copenhagen climate conference in December. It would not start until 2013, and could eventually channel tens of billions of dollars a year from rich to poor countries.
How would it work?
Countries would have to show, from historical data, satellite imagery and through direct measurement of trees, the extent, condition and the carbon content of their forests. Verification, reporting and monitoring would be done by communities which depend on the forests or by independent organisations.
Who pays?
There are several proposals. Countries could either be paid by "voluntary funding" — rather like existing official aid given by one country to another, or cash could be linked to carbon markets One plan is for an international auction of emissions allowances and another proposes to issue Redd credits which would be tradable alongside existing certified emissions reductions (CERs). Companies and governments unable to meet their obligations to reduce emissions would then buy them at the international market price. Payment for performance.
What are the problems?
How do you measure the carbon in a forest? There is no accurate data on most of the world's forested areas and so far no one agreed way to accurately measure the carbon content of vast numbers of different species of trees in different kinds of forests. Most forested countries also do not have the money to measure and assess their forests.
What about people in the forests?
Tens of millions of people live in and many more depend on the world's forests for a living. Most are traditionally marginalised or ignored by central governments. But their lifestyles could be drastically affected if governments or carbon companies move in, valuing the forests more highly than them. There are fears of land grabs and forced evictions.
Who owns the carbon?
Land ownership is highly disputed in most forested countries. Governments would have to pass new laws to refine who owns the carbon credits. Land in some countries is owned by the communities but trees may belong to the state. Does tree ownership confer carbon rights? How do you make sure that communities who protect the forests are rewarded, rather than say logging or mining companies who often have the legal rights on trees?
What about corruption?
by corrupt politicians or illegal logging companies. Many heavily forested countries are some of the most corrupt in the world and are home to some notorious logging companies close to politicians. Policing forests is nearly impossible, and money is likely to be diverted by people in power. The likelihood of international money getting to the people who depend on the forests is unlikely. Governments can overstate the case that their forests are in danger.
What if the carbon market fails?
The market price of carbon could collapse if too many Redd credits flooded onto the market. With no financial incentive to protect the trees, people would revert to logging.

Climate change will affect the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals

Climate change will affect the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals

Climate change will affect the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MGDs) since it will increase poverty, affect education, women and children, and plunge the whole world into a disaster.
The impacts of climate change were indiscriminate and affected anybody over 300,000 deaths are recorded annually due to climate change while over 300 million people are affected severely by climate change annually
Millions of people especially in Africa are already suffering from the effects of climate change, examples of people migrating from the drought and flood hit areas in some part of the Northern region recently.

We MUST put in place mitigation measures to reduce the effect of climate change on our people

"when the voice of the people become so loud the government has no alternative but to listen" Martin Luther King Jnr.

Kenneth Nana Amoateng
Abibimman Foundation
Ghana National Youth Coalition on Climate Change (GNYCCC)
GCAP/MDGs-Ghana
P.O.BOX BT 1 Tema
Flat 1/A 74 Site 3
(OPP T.DC),Commmunit 1
Tema-Ghana/African
E-Mail: abibimmanfoundation@gmail.com,amoatengken@yahoo.com
Tel# 233-22-213918
Mob# 2332-244023651

I'm on assignment to my generation.

Ghana has lost 45 per cent of forest cover

Ghana has lost 45 per cent of forest cover

Ghana has already lost about 45 per cent of her forest cover, and suggested an efficient regulation of the activities of chain saw operators in the country.

Currently about 36 billion tons of carbon dioxide is produced annually out of which about 17 billion tons is released into the atmosphere.Africa will reduce its carbon dioxide emission since the continent contributed very little to carbon dioxide emission globally.

Low public awareness about the subject and the effects of forest cover and climate change. emphasizing the need for people to know about the happenings , to facilitate attitudinal change among the wider public.

"when the voice of the people become so loud the government has no alternative but to listen" Martin Luther King Jnr.

Kenneth Nana Amoateng
Abibimman Foundation
Ghana National Youth Coalition on Climate Change (GNYCCC)
GCAP/MDGs-Ghana
P.O.BOX BT 1 Tema
Flat 1/A 74 Site 3
(OPP T.DC),Commmunit 1
Tema-Ghana/African
E-Mail: abibimmanfoundation@gmail.com,amoatengken@yahoo.com
Tel# 233-22-213918
Mob# 2332-244023651